„Those who understand history are condemned to watch other idiots repeat it.“

— Hakim Bey

Hakim Bey Foto
Hakim Bey15
1945
Anuncio

Citas similares

 Aristotle Foto

„Those who know, do. Those that understand, teach.“

—  Aristotle Classical Greek philosopher, student of Plato and founder of Western philosophy -384 - -322 a.C.

Joachim Peiper Foto

„History is always written by the victor and histories of the vanquished belong to a shrinking circle of those who were there.“

— Joachim Peiper SS officer 1915 - 1976
Parker, Hitler's Warrior, chapter 19, citing Peiper to Karl Wortmann, November 28, 1974 in note 27.

Anuncio
Bartolomé de las Casas Foto

„God is the one who always remembers those whom history has forgotten.“

— Bartolomé de las Casas Spanish Dominican friar, historian, and social reformer 1484 - 1566

Booker T. Washington Foto
Vladimir Lenin Foto
Johann Sebastian Bach Foto
Martin Luther King, Jr. Foto
Anuncio
John Wayne Foto
John Lennon Foto

„As usual, there is a great woman behind every idiot.“

— John Lennon English singer and songwriter 1940 - 1980

Augusto Pinochet Foto

„My library is filled with UN condemnations.“

— Augusto Pinochet Former dictator of the republic of Chile 1915 - 2006
Speech (26 December 1986), quoted in "Las frases para el bronce de Pinochet."

Henry Miller Foto
Anuncio
Margaret Thatcher Foto
Tupac Shakur Foto
Jimmy Carter Foto

„I think as far as the adverse impact on the nation around
the world, this administration has been the worst in history...
The overt reversal of America's basic values as expressed by
previous administrations, including those of George H. W. Bush
and Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon and others, has been the
most disturbing to me.“

— Jimmy Carter American politician, 39th president of the United States (in office from 1977 to 1981) 1924
Context: Who ever decided that Americans were so bad off in the seventies anyway? From the right-wing revisionist propaganda that has become accepted as fact, you'd think that Americans under President Carter were suffering through something like the worst of the Weimar Republic combined with the Siege of Leningrad. The truth is that on a macroeconomic level, the difference between the Carter era and the Reagan era was minimal. For instance, economic growth during the Carter Administration averaged 2.8 percent annually, while under Reagan, from 1982 to 1989, growth averaged 3.2 percent. Was it really worth killing ourselves over that extra.4 percent of growth? For a lucky few, yes. On the other key economic gauge, unemployment, the Carter years were actually better than Reagan's, averaging 6.7 pervent annually during his "malaise-stricken" term as compared to an average 7.3 percent unemployment rate during the glorious eight-year reign of Ronald Reagan. Under Carter, people worked less, got far more benefits, and the country grew almost the same average annual rate as Reagan. On the other hand, according to the Statistical Abstract of the United States for 1996, under Reagan life got worse for those who had it worse: the number of people below the poverty line increased in almost every year from 1981 (31.8 million) to 1992 (39.3 million). And yet, we are told America was in decline until Reagan came to power and that the country was gripped by this ethereal malaise. Where was this malaise? Whose America was in decline? The problem with the 1970s wasn't that America was in decline, it was that the plutocracy felt itself declining. And in the plutocrats' eyes, their fortunes are synonymous with America's. Mark Ames, Going Postal: Rage, Murder and Rebellion: From Reagan's Workplaces to Clinton's Columbine and Beyond (2005), p. 99

Siguiente