Frases de Jacques Ellul
página 2

Jacques Ellul nació y vivió en Burdeos, Francia, fue un filósofo, sociólogo, teólogo, y anarquista cristiano francés. Educado en las universidades de Burdeos y París, fue profesor de historia de la ley e historia social en Burdeos y miembro relevante de la comunidad protestante francesa. Escribió varios libros contra la sociedad tecnológica, y algunos sobre la relación entre el cristianismo y la política, tal como Anarquía y Cristianismo argumentando que el anarquismo y el cristianismo compartían los mismos fines sociales.

Es considerado, junto a sus amigos Iván Illich y Bernard Charbonneau, uno de los padres de las ideas sobre el post-desarrollo, del decrecimiento y de simplicidad voluntaria; es decir de la ecología política.

Ellul considera que vivimos en una sociedad tecnológica, que denomina sistema técnico, cuyo modelo de racionalidad es la eficiencia. El hombre es un ser constituido por una gran diversidad de dimensiones pero, según el autor, la tecnológica ha desplazado a todas las demás para centrarse en la potencia y en la eficacia. Ante esta situación propone una ética del no-poder, que se caracteriza por no colaborar con el sistema técnico. El no-poder es lo contrario de la impotencia y se caracteriza por la frase puedo pero no quiero.

Durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial, fue un líder en la resistencia francesa. Wikipedia  

✵ 6. enero 1912 – 19. mayo 1994   •   Otros nombres 雅克·埃呂爾, ז'ק אלול
Jacques Ellul Foto
Jacques Ellul: 126   frases 0   Me gusta

Jacques Ellul Frases y Citas

Jacques Ellul: Frases en inglés

“The civic and technological good will and the enthusiasm for the right social myths — both created by propaganda — will finally have solved the problem of man.”

Jacques Ellul libro Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes

Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes (1965)
Contexto: In the midst of increasing mechanization and technological organization, propaganda is simply the means used to prevent these things from being felt as too oppressive and to persuade man to submit with good grace. When man will be fully adapted to this technological society, when he will end by obeying with enthusiasm, convinced of the excellence of what he is forced to do, the constraint of the organization will no longer be felt by him; the truth is, it will no longer be a constraint, and the police will have nothing to do. The civic and technological good will and the enthusiasm for the right social myths — both created by propaganda — will finally have solved the problem of man.

Vintage, p. xviii

“This is the very heart of modern religion, the religion of the established fact, the religion on which depend the lesser religions of the dollar, race, or the proletariat, which are only expressions of the great modern divinity, the Moloch of fact.”

Fuente: The Presence of the Kingdom (1948), p. 37
Contexto: People think that they have no right to judge a fact — all they have to do is to accept it. Thus from the moment that technics, the State, or production, are facts, we must worship them as facts, and we must try to adapt ourselves to them. This is the very heart of modern religion, the religion of the established fact, the religion on which depend the lesser religions of the dollar, race, or the proletariat, which are only expressions of the great modern divinity, the Moloch of fact.

“In a society such as ours, it is almost impossible for a person to be responsible.”

The Betrayal by Technology (1993 film)
Contexto: In a society such as ours, it is almost impossible for a person to be responsible. A simple example: a dam has been built somewhere, and it bursts. Who is responsible for that? Geologists worked out. They examined the terrain. Engineers drew up the construction plans. Workmen constructed it. And the politicians decided that the dam had to be in that spot. Who is responsible? No one. There is never anyone responsible. Anywhere. In the whole of our technological society the work is so fragmented and broken up into small pieces that no one is responsible. But no one is free either. Everyone has his own, specific task. And that's all he has to do.
Just consider, for example, that atrocious excuse… It was one of the most horrible things I have ever heard. The director of the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp was asked at the Nuremburg trials, “But didn’t you find it horrible? All those corpses?” He replied, “What could I do? I couldn’t process all those corpses. The capacity of the ovens was too small. It caused me many problems. I had no time to think about these people. I was too busy with the technical problem of my ovens.” That is the classic example of an irresponsible person. He carries out his technical task and isn’t interested in anything else.

“People think that they have no right to judge a fact — all they have to do is to accept it.”

Fuente: The Presence of the Kingdom (1948), p. 37
Contexto: People think that they have no right to judge a fact — all they have to do is to accept it. Thus from the moment that technics, the State, or production, are facts, we must worship them as facts, and we must try to adapt ourselves to them. This is the very heart of modern religion, the religion of the established fact, the religion on which depend the lesser religions of the dollar, race, or the proletariat, which are only expressions of the great modern divinity, the Moloch of fact.

“In the midst of increasing mechanization and technological organization, propaganda is simply the means used to prevent these things from being felt as too oppressive and to persuade man to submit with good grace.”

Jacques Ellul libro Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes

Vintage, p. xviii
Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes (1965)
Contexto: In the midst of increasing mechanization and technological organization, propaganda is simply the means used to prevent these things from being felt as too oppressive and to persuade man to submit with good grace. When man will be fully adapted to this technological society, when he will end by obeying with enthusiasm, convinced of the excellence of what he is forced to do, the constraint of the organization will no longer be felt by him; the truth is, it will no longer be a constraint, and the police will have nothing to do. The civic and technological good will and the enthusiasm for the right social myths — both created by propaganda — will finally have solved the problem of man.

“Technique is totally irrelevant to this notion and pursues no end, professed or unprofessed.”

Jacques Ellul libro The Technological Society

Fuente: The Technological Society (1954), p. 97
Contexto: A principal characteristic of technique … is its refusal to tolerate moral judgments. It is absolutely independent of them and eliminates them from its domain. Technique never observes the distinction between moral and immoral use. It tends on the contrary, to create a completely independent technical morality.
Here, then, is one of the elements of weakness of this point of view. It does not perceive technique's rigorous autonomy with respect to morals; it does not see that the infusion of some more or less vague sentiment of human welfare cannot alter it. Not even the moral conversion of the technicians could make a difference. At best, they would cease to be good technicians. This attitude supposes further that technique evolves with some end in view, and that this end is human good. Technique is totally irrelevant to this notion and pursues no end, professed or unprofessed.

“Propaganda does not aim to elevate man, but to make him serve.”

Jacques Ellul libro Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes

Vintage, p. 38
Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes (1965)

“Freedom is completely without meaning unless it is related to necessity, unless it represents victory over necessity.”

Jacques Ellul libro The Technological Society

Fuente: The Technological Society (1954), p. xxxii

“The first builder of a city was Cain.”

Jacques Ellul libro The Meaning of the City

Fuente: The Meaning of the City (1951), p. 1