Frases de Arthur Stanley Eddington
página 4

Arthur Stanley Eddington OM fue un astrofísico británico muy conocido en la primera mitad del siglo XX. El límite de Eddington, el límite natural de la luminosidad que puede ser radiada por acreción a un objeto compacto, tomó su nombre.

Es famoso por su trabajo relacionado con la teoría de la relatividad. En 1919 escribió un artículo titulado Report on the relativity theory of gravitation , que transmitió la teoría de la relatividad de Albert Einstein al mundo anglosajón. Debido a la Primera Guerra Mundial, los avances científicos alemanes no eran muy conocidos en Gran Bretaña.

Demostró que la energía en el interior de las estrellas era transportada por radiación y convección. Estos trabajos quedaron plasmados en el libro The Internal Constitution of the Stars . Wikipedia  

✵ 28. diciembre 1882 – 22. noviembre 1944   •   Otros nombres Sir Arthur Eddington, Sir Arthur Stanley Eddington
Arthur Stanley Eddington Foto
Arthur Stanley Eddington: 115   frases 3   Me gusta

Frases célebres de Arthur Stanley Eddington

“¿Quién es el tercero?”

Respuesta cuando se le preguntó en 1919 si era cierto que sólo tres personas del mundo comprendían la teoría general de la Relatividad"
Atribuidas
Fuente: Citado por Brian Stableford en Science Fact and Science Fiction: An Encyclopedia (2006), 150

“La ley que afirma que la entropía siempre aumenta, ocupa según pienso, la posición suprema entre las leyes de la Naturaleza.”

Sobre la segunda ley de la termodinámica.
Fuente: The Nature of the Physical World (1927).

“Cuando el electrón abandona el átomo, cristaliza fuera de la neblina de Schrödinger como un genio emergiendo de su botella.”

Sobre la naturaleza cuántica del electrón.
Fuente: Gifford Lectures (1927), The Nature of the Physical World (1928), p. 199.

“Para decirlo crudamente: la sustancia del mundo es la sustancia mental.”

Fuente: The Nature of the Physical World (Gifford Lectures, 1927), Cambridge University Press, Londres, 1930 , p. 276.

Arthur Stanley Eddington Frases y Citas

“La mecánica ondulatoria de Schrödinger no es una teoría física; es un truco, muy bien ejecutado por cierto.”

Argumentando contra el carácter probabilístico de la mecánica cuántica.
Fuente: La naturaleza del mundo físico (1937), traducido por Carlos María Reyles, Ed. Sudamericana, Buenos Aires, 1952, p.238.

“Creo que hay 15.747.724.136.275.002.577.605.653.961.181.555.468.044.717.914.527.116.709.366.231.025.076.185.631.031.296 protones en el Universo, y el mismo número de electrones.”

Sobre la extraordinaria coincidencia entre las cargas del protón y el electrón, dos partículas que pertenecen a distintas familias, pero cuyas cargas eléctricas se neutralizan entre sí.
Fuente: The Philosophy of Physical Science (1939), Tamer Lectures (1938), 170.

Arthur Stanley Eddington: Frases en inglés

“All change is relative. The universe is expanding relatively to our common material standards; our material standards are shrinking relatively to the size of the universe. The theory of the "expanding universe" might also be called the theory of the "shrinking atom."”

[…] Let us then take the whole universe as our standard of constancy, and adopt the view of a cosmic being whose body is composed of intergalactic spaces and swells as they swell. Or rather we must now say it keeps the same size, for he will not admit that it is he who has changed. Watching us for a few thousand million years, he sees us shrinking; atoms, animals, planets, even the galaxies, all shrink alike; only the intergalactic spaces remain the same. The earth spirals round the sun in an ever‑decreasing orbit. It would be absurd to treat its changing revolution as a constant unit of time. The cosmic being will naturally relate his units of length and time so that the velocity of light remains constant. Our years will then decrease in geometrical progression in the cosmic scale of time. On that scale man's life is becoming briefer; his threescore years and ten are an ever‑decreasing allowance. Owing to the property of geometrical progressions an infinite number of our years will add up to a finite cosmic time; so that what we should call the end of eternity is an ordinary finite date in the cosmic calendar. But on that date the universe has expanded to infinity in our reckoning, and we have shrunk to nothing in the reckoning of the cosmic being.
We walk the stage of life, performers of a drama for the benefit of the cosmic spectator. As the scenes proceed he notices that the actors are growing smaller and the action quicker. When the last act opens the curtain rises on midget actors rushing through their parts at frantic speed. Smaller and smaller. Faster and faster. One last microscopic blurr of intense agitation. And then nothing.

pp. 90–92 https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=KHyV4-2EyrUC&pg=PA90
The Expanding Universe (1933)

“In physics we have outgrown archer and apple-pie definitions of the fundamental symbols. To a request to explain what an electron really is supposed to be we can only answer, "It is part of the A B C of physics."”

The external world of physics has thus become a world of shadows. In removing our illusions we have removed the substance, for indeed we have seen that substance is one of the greatest of our illusions. Later perhaps we may inquire whether in our zeal to cut out all that is unreal we may not have used the knife too ruthlessly. Perhaps, indeed, reality is a child which cannot survive without its nurse illusion. But if so, that is of little concern to the scientist, who has good and sufficient reasons for pursuing his investigations in the world of shadows and is content to leave to the philosopher the determination of its exact status in regard to reality. In the world of physics we watch a shadowgraph performance of the drama of familiar life. The shadow of my elbow rests on the shadow table as the shadow ink flows over the shadow paper. It is all symbolic, and as a symbol the physicist leaves it. Then comes the alchemist Mind who transmutes the symbols. The sparsely spread nuclei of electric force become a tangible solid; their restless agitation becomes the warmth of summer; the octave of aethereal vibrations becomes a gorgeous rainbow. Nor does the alchemy stop here. In the transmuted world new significances arise which are scarcely to be traced in the world of symbols; so that it becomes a world of beauty and purpose — and, alas, suffering and evil.
The frank realisation that physical science is concerned with a world of shadows is one of the most significant of recent advances.

Introduction
The Nature of the Physical World (1928)