Fuente: The Washington Connection and Third World Fascism, with Noam Chomsky, 1979, p. 22.
Edward S. Herman: Frases en inglés
“National interest: The demands and needs of the corporate community.”
Fuente: Beyond Hypocrisy, 1992, Doublespeak Dictionary (within Beyond Hypocrisy), p. 156.
Fuente: The Washington Connection and Third World Fascism, with Noam Chomsky, 1979, p. 19.
Herman, “King of Chaos”, Z Magazine, March 2016, pp. 4-6.
2010s
Fuente: The Washington Connection and Third World Fascism, with Noam Chomsky, 1979, p. 1.
Peterson and Herman, “The Oliver Kamm School of Falsification: Imperial Truth-Enforcement, British Branch” https://mronline.org/2010/01/22/the-oliver-kamm-school-of-falsification-imperial-truth-enforcement-british-branch/, MR Online, January 22, 2010.
2010s
Fuente: Beyond Hypocrisy, 1992, Doublespeak Dictionary (within Beyond Hypocrisy), p. 125.
Herman (2011), “Preface”, The Srebrenica Massacre: Evidence, Context, Politics http://resistir.info/livros/srebrenica_massacre_rev_3.pdf, p. 15.
2010s
Fuente: Beyond Hypocrisy, 1992, Doublespeak Dictionary (within Beyond Hypocrisy), p. 124.
Fuente: Beyond Hypocrisy, 1992, Doublespeak Dictionary (within Beyond Hypocrisy), p. 160.
Peterson and Herman, “Genocide Denial and Genocide Facilitation: Gerald Caplan and The Politics of Genocide” https://mronline.org/2010/07/04/genocide-denial-and-genocide-facilitation-gerald-caplan-and-the-politics-of-genocide/, MR Online, July 4, 2010.
2010s
Sometimes the latter contention is only an excuse for unwillingness to market, although it may sometimes reflect an accurate assessment of how the media and journals will receive books that are strongly critical of the established order.
Fuente: The Washington Connection and Third World Fascism, with Noam Chomsky, 1979, pp. xiv-xvii.
“Patriotism: Judging disputes on the basis of place of residence.”
Fuente: Beyond Hypocrisy, 1992, Doublespeak Dictionary (within Beyond Hypocrisy), p. 161.
Fuente: Beyond Hypocrisy, 1992, Doublespeak Dictionary (within Beyond Hypocrisy), p. 152.
Herman (1999), The Myth of the Liberal Media: An Edward Herman Reader, p. 214.
1990s
Fuente: Manufacturing Consent, with Noam Chomsky, 1988, p. 252.
Fuente: After the Cataclysm: Postwar Indochina and the Reconstruction of Imperial Ideology, with Noam Chomsky, 1979, p. vii.
Fuente: Atrocities in Vietnam: Myths and Realities, 1970, pp. 13-14.
“Amazeen: “Is there anything you’d do differently if you could go back?””
Lent and Amazeen (2015), Key Thinkers in Critical Communication Scholarship, Interview with Edward S. Herman on September 2, 2013, pp. 56-57.
2010s
Fuente: Beyond Hypocrisy, 1992, p. 20.
<BR> Herman: The introduction of a structural model of the media, the use of pairing analysis, and the use of these methodological devices or frameworks in dozens of applications. The techniques are not new, but I and my co-authors have possibly given them more salience. Also, not new but hopefully in a useful framework is the focus on the mass media as elite-based and elite-serving institutions, with biases that follow accordingly. In a way, my writings have virtually all been an exposure of these biases and a demonstration that the idea of a “party line” applies to the mainstream US media as well as to media in authoritarian countries. Lent and Amazeen (2015), Key Thinkers in Critical Communication Scholarship, Interview with Edward S. Herman on September 2, 2013, pp. 51-52.
2010s
Fuente: Beyond Hypocrisy, 1992, Doublespeak Dictionary (within Beyond Hypocrisy), p. 153.
Of course, what is true of the “international community,” is true of academics as well.
Peterson and Herman, “Adam Jones on Rwanda and Genocide: A Reply” https://mronline.org/2010/08/14/adam-jones-on-rwanda-and-genocide-a-reply/, MR Online, August 14, 2010.
2010s
Preface to the 2014 Edition
After the Cataclysm: Postwar Indochina and the Reconstruction of Imperial Ideology, with Noam Chomsky, 1979
The evidence of worth may be read from the extent and character of attention and indignation. […] the U.S. media’s practical definitions of worth are political in the extreme and fit well the expectations of a propaganda model. While this differential treatment occurs on a large scale, the media, intellectuals, and public are able to remain unconscious of this fact and maintain a high moral and self-righteous tone. This is evidence of an extremely effective propaganda system. […] The worth of a victim Popieluszko [Polish priest] is valued at somewhere between 137 and 179 times that of a victim in the U.S. client states, or, looking at the matter in reverse, a priest murdered in Latin America is worth less than a hundredth of a priest murdered in Poland.
Fuente: Manufacturing Consent, with Noam Chomsky, 1988, pp. 37, 39.