Frases de Edward S. Herman
página 2

Edward S. Herman [1]​ fue un economista y analista de medios de comunicación estadounidense, especializado en las corporaciones que forman y cómo se regulan, así como las relaciones que tiene con las políticas económicas.

Fue profesor emérito de economía en la Wharton School de la Universidad de Pensilvania. También enseñó en el Annenberg School for Communication de la Universidad de Pensilvania. Realizó un bachillerato en artes de la Universidad de Pensilvania en 1945 y un doctorado en la Universidad de California, Berkeley en 1953.

Uno de sus libros más conocidos, escritos con Noam Chomsky, es Los guardianes de la libertad , que versa sobre el consenso fabricado por los medios de comunicación en sociedades democráticas. Wikipedia  

✵ 7. abril 1925 – 11. noviembre 2017
Edward S. Herman: 55   frases 0   Me gusta

Edward S. Herman: Frases en inglés

“National interest: The demands and needs of the corporate community.”

Fuente: Beyond Hypocrisy, 1992, Doublespeak Dictionary (within Beyond Hypocrisy), p. 156.

“Jesus Christ: An irresponsible rabble rouser of communistic tendency; victim of an early witch-hunt.”

Fuente: Beyond Hypocrisy, 1992, Doublespeak Dictionary (within Beyond Hypocrisy), p. 124.

“On the assumption that the shoot-down was central to the larger plan of Hutu Power and genocide, this would have required a miracle of Hutu incompetence; but it would be entirely understandable if it was carried out by Kagame’s force as part of their planned program to seize state power.”

Peterson and Herman, “Genocide Denial and Genocide Facilitation: Gerald Caplan and The Politics of Genocide” https://mronline.org/2010/07/04/genocide-denial-and-genocide-facilitation-gerald-caplan-and-the-politics-of-genocide/, MR Online, July 4, 2010.
2010s

“An earlier version of this volume was originally contracted for and produced as a monograph by Warner Modular Communications, Inc., a subsidiary member of the Warner communications and entertainment conglomerate. The publishing house had run a relatively independent operation up to the time of the controversy over this document. The editors and publisher were enthusiastic about the monograph and committed themselves to put it out quickly and to promote it with vigor. But just prior to publication, in the fall of 1973, officials of the parent company got wind of it, looked at it, and were horrified by its “unpatriotic” contents. Mr. William Sarnoff, a high officer of the parent company, for example, was deeply pained by our statement on page 7 of the original that the “leadership in the United States, as a result of its dominant position and wide-ranging counter-revolutionary efforts, has been the single most important instigator, administrator, and moral and material sustainer of serious bloodbaths in the years that followed World War II.” So pained were Sarnoff and his business associates, in fact, that they were quite prepared to violate a contractual obligation in order to assure that no such material would see the light of day. […] they decided to close down the publishing house […]. The history of the suppressed monograph is an authentic instance of private censorship of ideas per se. The uniqueness of the episode lies only in the manner of suppression. Usually, private intervention in the book market is anticipatory, with regrets that the manuscript is unacceptable, perhaps “unmarketable.””

Sometimes the latter contention is only an excuse for unwillingness to market, although it may sometimes reflect an accurate assessment of how the media and journals will receive books that are strongly critical of the established order.
Fuente: The Washington Connection and Third World Fascism, with Noam Chomsky, 1979, pp. xiv-xvii.

“Patriotism: Judging disputes on the basis of place of residence.”

Fuente: Beyond Hypocrisy, 1992, Doublespeak Dictionary (within Beyond Hypocrisy), p. 161.

“Amazeen: “Is there anything you’d do differently if you could go back?””

Lent and Amazeen (2015), Key Thinkers in Critical Communication Scholarship, Interview with Edward S. Herman on September 2, 2013, pp. 56-57.
2010s

“Lent: “What would you consider your major contribution to the field of scholarship? Your assessment of what you’ve done in a lifetime.””

<BR> Herman: The introduction of a structural model of the media, the use of pairing analysis, and the use of these methodological devices or frameworks in dozens of applications. The techniques are not new, but I and my co-authors have possibly given them more salience. Also, not new but hopefully in a useful framework is the focus on the mass media as elite-based and elite-serving institutions, with biases that follow accordingly. In a way, my writings have virtually all been an exposure of these biases and a demonstration that the idea of a “party line” applies to the mainstream US media as well as to media in authoritarian countries. Lent and Amazeen (2015), Key Thinkers in Critical Communication Scholarship, Interview with Edward S. Herman on September 2, 2013, pp. 51-52.
2010s

“A propaganda system will consistently portray people abused by enemy states as worthy victims, whereas those treated with equal or greater severity by its own government or clients will be unworthy.”

Edward S. Herman libro Los guardianes de la libertad

The evidence of worth may be read from the extent and character of attention and indignation. […] the U.S. media’s practical definitions of worth are political in the extreme and fit well the expectations of a propaganda model. While this differential treatment occurs on a large scale, the media, intellectuals, and public are able to remain unconscious of this fact and maintain a high moral and self-righteous tone. This is evidence of an extremely effective propaganda system. […] The worth of a victim Popieluszko [Polish priest] is valued at somewhere between 137 and 179 times that of a victim in the U.S. client states, or, looking at the matter in reverse, a priest murdered in Latin America is worth less than a hundredth of a priest murdered in Poland.
Fuente: Manufacturing Consent, with Noam Chomsky, 1988, pp. 37, 39.

Autores similares

Truman Capote Foto
Truman Capote 12
periodista y escritor estadounidense
Henry Louis Mencken Foto
Henry Louis Mencken 39
periodista estadounidense
Alberto Moravia Foto
Alberto Moravia 13
periodista y escritor italiano (1907-1990)
Henri Barbusse Foto
Henri Barbusse 8
escritor, periodista y militante comunista francés
Francois Mauriac Foto
Francois Mauriac 16
periodista, crítico y escritor francés
Gilbert Keith Chesterton Foto
Gilbert Keith Chesterton 60
escritor y periodista británico
Amos Oz Foto
Amos Oz 18
novelista y periodista israelí
José Saramago Foto
José Saramago 115
escritor, novelista, poeta, periodista y dramaturgo portugu…
Ramón Gómez De La Serna Foto
Ramón Gómez De La Serna 56
escritor y periodista español
John Katzenbach Foto
John Katzenbach 142
escritor estadounidense