Frases de Friedrich August von Hayek

Friedrich August von Hayek fue un filósofo, jurista y economista austriaco.

Exponente de la Escuela Austriaca, discípulo de Friedrich von Wieser y de Ludwig von Mises. Es conocido principalmente por su defensa del liberalismo y por sus críticas a la economía planificada y al socialismo que, como sostiene en Camino de servidumbre, considera un peligro para la libertad individual que conduce al totalitarismo. Fue laureado con el Premio del Banco de Suecia en Ciencias Económicas en memoria de Alfred Nobel en 1974.

Su obra, que comprende unos 130 artículos y 25 libros, no se limita únicamente a la ciencia económica, sino que trata desde filosofía política hasta antropología jurídica o historia, y en general todo lo referente a las ciencias sociales. Wikipedia  

✵ 8. mayo 1899 – 23. marzo 1992   •   Otros nombres Friedrich von Hayek, Фридрих Август фон Хайек

Obras

Camino de servidumbre
Friedrich August von Hayek
Friedrich August von Hayek: 105   frases 36   Me gusta

Frases célebres de Friedrich August von Hayek

Frases de fe de Friedrich August von Hayek

“…El error característico de los racionalistas constructivistas a este respecto estriba en que intentan basar sus argumentos en lo que se ha denominado la ilusión sinóptica, es decir, en la ficción de que todos los hechos relevantes son conocidos por alguna mente, y de que es posible construir a partir de este conocimiento de los particulares un orden social deseable. A veces la ilusión se expresa con un toque de conmovedora ingenuidad en los entusiastas de una sociedad deliberadamente planificada, como cuando alguno de ellos sueña con el desarrollo del “arte del pensar simultáneo: la capacidad de abordar a un tiempo una multitud de fenómenos interrelacionados, y de integrar en un solo esquema los atributos tanto cuantitativos como cualitativos de estos fenómenos”(Lewis Mumford). Tales sujetos parecen ignorar completamente que este sueño esquiva el problema central que plantea cualquier esfuerzo por comprender o conformar el orden de la sociedad: nuestra incapacidad para reunir como conjunto abarcable todos los datos que integran el orden social. Todos aquellos que están fascinados por los bellos planes que resultan de tal planteamiento porque son “tan ordenados, tan visibles y tan fácilmente comprensibles”(Jane Jacobs), son víctimas de la ilusión sinóptica y desconocen que estos planes deben su aparente claridad al hecho de que el planificador deja a un lado todos los hechos que desconoce”…”

Derecho, legislación y libertad

Frases de vejez de Friedrich August von Hayek

Friedrich August von Hayek Frases y Citas

Friedrich August von Hayek: Frases en inglés

“The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.”

Friedrich Hayek libro The Fatal Conceit

Fuente: 1980s and later, The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism (1988), Ch. 5: The Fatal Conceit.
Contexto: Whereas, in fact, specialised students, even after generations of effort, find it exceedingly difficult to explain such matters, and cannot agree on what are the causes or what will be the effects of particular events. The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.
To the naive mind that can conceive of order only as the product of deliberate arrangement, it may seem absurd that in complex conditions order, and adaptation to the unknown, can be achieved more effectively by decentralizing decisions and that a division of authority will actually extend the possibility of overall order. Yet that decentralization actually leads to more information being taken into account.

“It is no exaggeration to say that the central aim of socialism is to discredit those traditional morals which keep us alive.”

"The Origins and Effects of Our Morals: A Problem for Science", in The Essence of Hayek (1984)
1980s and later

“The more the state "plans" the more difficult planning becomes for the individual.”

Fuente: 1940s–1950s, The Road to Serfdom (1944), Chapter 6: Planning and the Rule of Law

“Well, I would say that, as long-term institutions, I am totally against dictatorships. But a dictatorship may be a necessary system for a transitional period. At times it is necessary for a country to have, for a time, some form or other of dictatorial power. As you will understand, it is possible for a dictator to govern in a liberal way. And it is also possible for a democracy to govern with a total lack of liberalism. Personally I prefer a liberal dictator to democratic government lacking liberalism.”

Interview in El Mercurio (1981)
1980s and later
Contexto: Well, I would say that, as long-term institutions, I am totally against dictatorships. But a dictatorship may be a necessary system for a transitional period. At times it is necessary for a country to have, for a time, some form or other of dictatorial power. As you will understand, it is possible for a dictator to govern in a liberal way. And it is also possible for a democracy to govern with a total lack of liberalism. Personally I prefer a liberal dictator to democratic government lacking liberalism. My personal impression — and this is valid for South America — is that in Chile, for example, we will witness a transition from a dictatorial government to a liberal government. And during this transition it may be necessary to maintain certain dictatorial powers, not as something permanent, but as a temporary arrangement.

“I have arrived at the conviction that the neglect by economists to discuss seriously what is really the crucial problem of our time is due to a certain timidity about soiling their hands by going from purely scientific questions into value questions.”

Conversation at the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C. (9 February 1978); published in A Conversation with Friedrich A. Von Hayek: Science and Socialism (1979)
1960s–1970s
Contexto: I have arrived at the conviction that the neglect by economists to discuss seriously what is really the crucial problem of our time is due to a certain timidity about soiling their hands by going from purely scientific questions into value questions. This is a belief deliberately maintained by the other side because if they admitted that the issue is not a scientific question, they would have to admit that their science is antiquated and that, in academic circles, it occupies the position of astrology and not one that has any justification for serious consideration in scientific discussion. It seems to me that socialists today can preserve their position in academic economics merely by the pretense that the differences are entirely moral questions about which science cannot decide.

“Yet that decentralization actually leads to more information being taken into account.”

Friedrich Hayek libro The Fatal Conceit

Fuente: 1980s and later, The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism (1988), Ch. 5: The Fatal Conceit.
Contexto: Whereas, in fact, specialised students, even after generations of effort, find it exceedingly difficult to explain such matters, and cannot agree on what are the causes or what will be the effects of particular events. The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.
To the naive mind that can conceive of order only as the product of deliberate arrangement, it may seem absurd that in complex conditions order, and adaptation to the unknown, can be achieved more effectively by decentralizing decisions and that a division of authority will actually extend the possibility of overall order. Yet that decentralization actually leads to more information being taken into account.

“Any kind of discrimination — be it on grounds of religion, political opinion, race, or whatever it is — seems to be incompatible with the idea of freedom under the law. Experience has shown that separate never is equal and cannot be equal.”

"Conversation with Systematic Liberalism," Forum (September 1961). <!-- p. 6. ; also in Friedrich Hayek : A Biography (2003) by Alan O. Ebenstein-->
1960s–1970s
Contexto: nowiki>[Apartheid law in South Africa] appears to be a clear and even extreme instance of that discrimination between different individuals which seems to me to be incompatible with the reign of liberty. The essence of what I said [in The Constitution of Liberty] was really the fact that the laws under which government can use coercion are equal for all responsible adult members of that society. Any kind of discrimination — be it on grounds of religion, political opinion, race, or whatever it is — seems to be incompatible with the idea of freedom under the law. Experience has shown that separate never is equal and cannot be equal.

“Our basic problem is that we have three levels, I would say, of moral beliefs. We have the first instance, our intuitive moral feelings which are adapted to the small, person-to-person society where we act for people whom we know and are served by people whom we know. Then, we have a society governed by moral traditions which, unlike what modern rationalists believe, are not intellectual discoveries of men who designed them, but as a result of a persons, which I now prefer to describe as term of 'group selection.' Those groups who had accidentally developed such as the tradition of private property and the family who did succeed, but never understood this. So we owe our present extended order of human cooperation very largely to a moral tradition which the intellectual does not approve of, because it has never been intellectually designed and it has to compete with a third level of moral beliefs, those which the morals which the intellectuals designed in the hope that they can better satisfy man's instincts than the traditional morals to do. And we live in a world where three moral traditions are in constant conflict, the innate ones, the traditional ones, and the intellectually designed ones, and ultimately, all our political conflicts of this time can be reduced as affected by a conflict between free moral tradition of a different nature, not only of different content.”

in 1985 interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11AXDT5824Y with John O'Sullivan
1980s and later

“Since the value of freedom rests on the opportunities it provides for unforeseen and unpredictable actions, we will rarely know what we lose through a particular restriction of freedom.”

“Principles or Expediency?” Toward Liberty: Essays in Honor of Ludwig von Mises on the Occasion of his 90th Birthday (29 September 1971)
1960s–1970s

Autores similares

Amartya Sen Foto
Amartya Sen 10
economista indio
Ludwig von Mises Foto
Ludwig von Mises 35
Economista de la escuela austriaca
John Maynard Keynes Foto
John Maynard Keynes 23
economista inglés
Bertrand Russell Foto
Bertrand Russell 101
filósofo, matemático, lógico y escritor británico
Max Weber Foto
Max Weber 13
filósofo, economista, jurista, historiador, politólogo y so…
Joseph E. Stiglitz Foto
Joseph E. Stiglitz 22
economista y profesor estadounidense
Paul Samuelson Foto
Paul Samuelson 23
economista estadounidense
Ludwig Wittgenstein Foto
Ludwig Wittgenstein 44
filósofo nacido en Viena
Zygmunt Bauman Foto
Zygmunt Bauman 68
Sociólogo, filósofo y ensayista polaco
Aldous Huxley Foto
Aldous Huxley 215
escritor británico