Frases de Henri Poincaré

Henri Poincaré Foto
9  0

Henri Poincaré

Fecha de nacimiento: 29. Abril 1854
Fecha de muerte: 17. Julio 1912
Otros nombres:Анри Пуанкаре

Anuncio

Jules Henri Poincaré , generalmente conocido como Henri Poincaré, fue un prestigioso polímata: matemático, físico, científico teórico y filósofo de la ciencia, primo del presidente de Francia Raymond Poincaré. Poincaré es descrito a menudo como el último «universalista» capaz de entender y contribuir en todos los ámbitos de la disciplina matemática. En 1894 estableció el grupo fundamental de un espacio topológico.

Autores similares

Albert Einstein Foto
Albert Einstein267
físico germano-estadounidense, creador de la teoría de la...
Blaise Pascal Foto
Blaise Pascal132
Matemático, físico, filósofo cristiano y escritor
Évariste Galois Foto
Évariste Galois3
matemático francés
Srinivasa Ramanujan Foto
Srinivasa Ramanujan1
matemático hindú
Tales de Mileto Foto
Tales de Mileto25
filósofo y científico

Frases Henri Poincaré

Anuncio
Anuncio

„It is only through science and art that civilization is of value“

— Henri Poincaré
Context: It is only through science and art that civilization is of value. Some have wondered at the formula: science for its own sake; an yet it is as good as life for its own sake, if life is only misery; and even as happiness for its own sake, if we do not believe that all pleasures are of the same quality... Every act should have an aim. We must suffer, we must work, we must pay for our place at the game, but this is for seeing's sake; or at the very least that others may one day see.<!--p.142 Ch. 11: Science and Reality

„For a definition to be of any use, it must teach us to measure force; moreover that suffices; it is not at all necessary that it teach us what force is in itself, nor whether it is the cause or the effect of motion.“

— Henri Poincaré
Context: What is mass? According to Newton, it is the product of the volume by the density. According to Thomson and Tait, it would be better to say that density is the quotient of the mass by the volume. What is force? It, is replies Lagrange, that which moves or tends to move a body. It is, Kirchhoff will say, the product of the mass by the acceleration. But then, why not say the mass is the quotient of the force by the acceleration? These difficulties are inextricable. When we say force is the cause of motion, we talk metaphysics, and this definition, if one were content with it, would be absolutely sterile. For a definition to be of any use, it must teach us to measure force; moreover that suffices; it is not at all necessary that it teach us what force is in itself, nor whether it is the cause or the effect of motion. We must therefore first define the equality of two forces. When shall we say two forces are equal? It is, we are told, when, applied to the same mass, they impress upon it the same acceleration, or when, opposed directly one to the other, they produce equilibrium. This definition is only a sham. A force applied to a body can not be uncoupled to hook it up to another body, as one uncouples a locomotive to attach it to another train. It is therefore impossible to know what acceleration such a force, applied to such a body, would impress upon such an other body, if it were applied to it. It is impossible to know how two forces which are not directly opposed would act, if they were directly opposed. We are... obliged in the definition of the equality of the two forces to bring in the principle of the equality of action and reaction; on this account, this principle must no longer be regarded as an experimental law, but as a definition.<!--pp.73-74 Ch. VI: The Classical Mechanics (1905) Tr. https://books.google.com/books?id=5nQSAAAAYAAJ George Bruce Halstead

„Science is built up with facts, as a house is with stones. But a collection of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house.“

— Henri Poincaré
Context: The Scientist must set in order. Science is built up with facts, as a house is with stones. But a collection of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house. Ch. IX: Hypotheses in Physics, Tr. George Bruce Halsted (1913)

Anuncio

„All that is not thought is pure nothingness“

— Henri Poincaré
Context: All that is not thought is pure nothingness; since we can think only thought and all the words we use to speak of things can express only thoughts, to say there is something other than thought, is therefore an affirmation which can have no meaning. And yet—strange contradiction for those who believe in time—geologic history shows us that life is only a short episode between two eternities of death, and that, even in this episode, conscious thought has lasted and will last only a moment. Thought is only a gleam in the midst of a long night. But it is this gleam which is everything.<!--p.142 Ch. 11: Science and Reality

„What has taught us to know the true profound analogies, those the eyes do not see but reason divines?
It is the mathematical spirit, which disdains matter to cling only to pure form.“

— Henri Poincaré
Context: All laws are... deduced from experiment; but to enunciate them, a special language is needful... ordinary language is too poor... This... is one reason why the physicist can not do without mathematics; it furnishes him the only language he can speak. And a well-made language is no indifferent thing; ... the analyst, who pursues a purely esthetic aim, helps create, just by that, a language more fit to satisfy the physicist. ... law springs from experiment, but not immediately. Experiment is individual, the law deduced from it is general; experiment is only approximate, the law is precise... In a word, to get the law from experiment, it is necessary to generalize... But how generalize?... in this choice what shall guide us? It can only be analogy.... What has taught us to know the true profound analogies, those the eyes do not see but reason divines? It is the mathematical spirit, which disdains matter to cling only to pure form.<!--pp.76-77 Ch. 5: Analysis and Physics

„Induction applied to the physical sciences is always uncertain, because it rests on the belief in a general order of the universe, an order outside of us.“

— Henri Poincaré
Context: But, one will say, if raw experience can not legitimatize reasoning by recurrence, is it so of experiment aided by induction? We see successively that a theorem is true of the number 1, of the number 2, of the number 3 and so on; the law is evident, we say, and it has the same warranty as every physical law based on observations, whose number is very great but limited. But there is an essential difference. Induction applied to the physical sciences is always uncertain, because it rests on the belief in a general order of the universe, an order outside of us. Mathematical induction, that is, demonstration by recurrence, on the contrary, imposes itself necessarily, because it is only the affirmation of a property of the mind itself.<!--pp.13-14 Ch. I. (1905) Tr. George Bruce Halstead

„The very possibility of the science of mathematics seems an insoluble contradiction.“

— Henri Poincaré
Context: The very possibility of the science of mathematics seems an insoluble contradiction. If this science is deductive only in appearance, whence does it derive that perfect rigor no one dreams of doubting? If, on the contrary, all the propositions it enunciates can be deduced one from another by the rules of formal logic, why is not mathematics reduced to an immense tautology? The syllogism can teach us nothing essentially new, and, if everything is to spring from the principle of identity, everything should be capable of being reduced to it. Shall we then admit that the enunciations of all those theorems which fill so many volumes are nothing but devious ways of saying A is A!... Does the mathematical method proceed from particular to the general, and, if so, how can it be called deductive?... If we refuse to admit these consequences, it must be conceded that mathematical reasoning has of itself a sort of creative virtue and consequently differs from a syllogism.<!--pp.5-6 Ch. I: On the Nature of Mathematical Reasoning (1905) Tr. https://books.google.com/books?id=5nQSAAAAYAAJ George Bruce Halstead

Siguiente
Aniversarios de hoy
Billie Joe Armstrong Foto
Billie Joe Armstrong131
vocalista, compositor y guitarrista de la banda Green Day 1972
Matthieu Ricard Foto
Matthieu Ricard11
Biólogo molecular y monje budista 1946
Richard Feynman Foto
Richard Feynman63
1918 - 1988
Big L Foto
Big L3
1974 - 1999
Otros (number)s aniversarios hoy
Autores similares
Albert Einstein Foto
Albert Einstein267
físico germano-estadounidense, creador de la teoría de la...
Blaise Pascal Foto
Blaise Pascal132
Matemático, físico, filósofo cristiano y escritor
Évariste Galois Foto
Évariste Galois3
matemático francés
James Clerk Maxwell Foto
James Clerk Maxwell14
físico escocés