Frases de Jiddu Krishnamurti
página 6

Jiddu Krishnamurti o J. Krishnamurti , fue un conocido escritor y orador en materia filosófica y espiritual. Sus principales temas incluían la revolución psicológica, el propósito de la meditación, las relaciones humanas, la naturaleza de la mente y cómo llevar a cabo un cambio positivo en la sociedad global.

Krishnamurti nació en la ciudad de Madanapalle, Andhra Pradesh, en la India colonial, y fue descubierto en 1909, cuando aún era un adolescente, por Charles Webster Leadbeater en las playas privadas del centro de la Sociedad Teosófica de Adyar en Madrás, India. Posteriormente fue adoptado y criado bajo la tutela de Annie Besant y C.W. Leadbeater dentro de la Sociedad Teosófica, quienes vieron en él a un posible Líder Espiritual. Sin embargo, rehusó ser el mesías de un nuevo credo, hasta que en 1929 disolvió la orden creada para ese fin. Alegaba no tener nacionalidad, ni pertenecer a ninguna religión, clase social, o pensamiento filosófico. Pasó el resto de su vida como conferenciante y profesor viajando por el mundo y enseñando sobre la mente humana, tanto a grandes como a pequeños grupos. Fue autor de varios libros, entre ellos La libertad primera y última libertad, La única revolución y Las notas de Krishnamurti. A la edad de 90 años dio una conferencia en la ONU acerca de la paz y la conciencia, y recibió la Medalla de la Paz de la ONU en 1984. Su última conferencia fue dada un mes antes de su muerte en 1986.

Paradójicamente, sus continuadores fundaron varias escuelas, en la India, Inglaterra y Estados Unidos; y tradujeron a varios idiomas muchos de sus discursos, publicándolos como libros filosóficos.

La biógrafa Mary Lutyens escribió un libro acerca de la juventud de Krishnamurti cuando vivía en la India, Inglaterra, y finalmente en Ojai, California titulada Krishnamurti: The Years of Awakening. Ella formaba parte de la Orden de la estrella, organización fundada para Krishnamurti cuando este aún era muy joven. Por ello, lo conoció desde su adolescencia hasta su muerte. Este libro posee muchos detalles acerca de su vida durante ese periodo, algunos de ellos rara vez fueron tratados por él. Lutyens escribió tres volúmenes adicionales de la biografía: The Years of Fulfillment , The Open Door , y Krishnamurti and the Rajagopals . Adicionalmente, publica y abrevia los tres primeros volúmenes en el libro The Life and Death of Krishnamurti . Otras biografías de Krishnamurti son: Krishnamurti, A Biography , por Pupul Jayakar y Star In the East: Krishnamurti, The Invention of a Messiah , por Roland Vernon.

✵ 12. mayo 1895 – 17. febrero 1986
Jiddu Krishnamurti Foto
Jiddu Krishnamurti: 263   frases 46   Me gusta

Frases célebres de Jiddu Krishnamurti

Frases de libros de Jiddu Krishnamurti

Jiddu Krishnamurti Frases y Citas

Jiddu Krishnamurti: Frases en inglés

“Are you trying to grasp the quality of intelligence, compassion, the immense sense of beauty, the perfume of love and that truth which has no path to it?”

Last Talks at Saanen, 1985 (1987), p. 158
1980s
Contexto: The questioner says, how can the conditioned brain grasp the unlimited, which is beauty, love, and truth? What is the ground of compassion and intelligence, and can it come upon us — each one of us? Are you inviting compassion? Are you inviting intelligence? Are you inviting beauty, love, and truth? Are you trying to grasp it? I am asking you. Are you trying to grasp the quality of intelligence, compassion, the immense sense of beauty, the perfume of love and that truth which has no path to it? Is that what you are grasping — wanting to find out the ground upon which it dwells? Can the limited brain grasp this? You cannot possibly grasp it, hold it. You can do all kinds of meditation, fast, torture yourself, become terribly austere, having one suit, or one robe. All this has been done. The rich cannot come to the truth, neither the poor. Nor the people who have taken a vow of celibacy, of silence, of austerity. All that is determined by thought, put together sequentially by thought; it is all the cultivation of deliberate thought, of deliberate intent.

“We are concerned, not with the development of just one capacity, such as that of a mathematician, or a scientist, or a musician, but with the total development of the student as a human being.”

"Life Ahead: On Learning and the Search for Meaning" (1963), Introduction http://www.jkrishnamurti.com/krishnamurti-teachings/view-text.php?tid=38&chid=331, J.Krishnamurti Online, JKO Serial No. 261, p. 13, 2005 edition
1960s
Contexto: Learning in the true sense of the word is possible only in that state of attention, in which there is no outer or inner compulsion. Right thinking can come about only when the mind is not enslaved by tradition and memory. It is attention that allows silence to come upon the mind, which is the opening of the door to creation. That is why attention is of the highest importance. Knowledge is necessary at the functional level as a means of cultivating the mind, and not as an end in itself. We are concerned, not with the development of just one capacity, such as that of a mathematician, or a scientist, or a musician, but with the total development of the student as a human being. How is the state of attention to be brought about? It cannot be cultivated through persuasion, comparison, reward or punishment, all of which are forms of coercion. The elimination of fear is the beginning of attention. Fear must exist as long as there is an urge to be or to become, which is the pursuit of success, with all its frustrations and tortuous contradictions. You can teach concentration, but attention cannot be taught just as you cannot possibly teach freedom from fear; but we can begin to discover the causes that produce fear, and in understanding these causes there is the elimination of fear. So attention arises spontaneously when around the student there is an atmosphere of well-being, when he has the feeling of being secure, of being at ease, and is aware of the disinterested action that comes with love. Love does not compare, and so the envy and torture of "becoming" cease.

“Attention is not concentration.”

Vol. XV, p. 321
Posthumous publications, The Collected Works
Contexto: Attention is not concentration. When you concentrate, as most people try to do — what takes place when you are concentrating? You are cutting yourself off, resisting, pushing away every thought except that one particular thought, that one particular action. So your concentration breeds resistance, and therefore concentration does not bring freedom. Please, this is very simple if you observe it yourself. But whereas if you are attentive, attentive to everything that is going on about you, attentive to the dirt, the filth of the street, attentive to the bus which is so dirty, attentive of your words, your gestures, the way you talk to your boss, the way you talk to your servant, to the superior, to the inferior, the respect, the callousness to those below you, the words, the ideas — if you are attentive to all that, not correcting, then out of that attention you can know a different kind of concentration. You are then aware of the setting, the noise of the people, people talking over there on the roof, your hushing them up, asking them not to talk, turning your head; you are aware of the various colours, the costumes, and yet concentration is going on. Such concentration is not exclusive, in that there is no effort. Whereas mere concentration demands effort.

“That is the first thing to learn — not to seek.”

1960s, Freedom From The Known (1969)
Contexto: That is the first thing to learn — not to seek. When you seek you are really only window-shopping. The question of whether or not there is a God or truth or reality, or whatever you like to call it, can never be answered by books, by priests, philosophers or saviours. Nobody and nothing can answer the question but you yourself and that is why you must know yourself. Immaturity lies only in total ignorance of self. To understand yourself is the beginning of wisdom.

“See what happens when the brain is completely still.”

Fuente: 1970s, The Urgency of Change (1970), p. 184
Contexto: The brain is the source of thought. The brain is matter and thought is matter. Can the brain — with all its reactions and its immediate responses to every challenge and demand — can the brain be very still? It is not a question of ending thought, but of whether the brain can be completely still? This stillness is not physical death. See what happens when the brain is completely still. <!-- π

“Superstition is another mighty evil, and has caused much terrible cruelty. The man who is a slave to it despises others who are wiser, tries to force them to do as he does.”

§ IV
1910s, At the Feet of the Master (1911)
Contexto: Superstition is another mighty evil, and has caused much terrible cruelty. The man who is a slave to it despises others who are wiser, tries to force them to do as he does. Think of the awful slaughter produced by the superstition that animals should be sacrificed, and by the still more cruel superstition that man needs flesh for food. Think of the treatment which superstition has meted out to the depressed classes in our beloved India, and see in that how this evil quality can breed heartless cruelty even among those who know the duty of brotherhood. Many crimes have men committed in the name of the God of Love, moved by this nightmare of superstition; be very careful therefore that no slightest trace of it remains in you.

“The society in which we live is the result of our psychological state.”

1st Public Talk, Berkeley, California (3 February 1969)
1960s

“Just observe what you are. What you are is the fact: the fact that you are jealous, anxious, envious, brutal, demanding, violent. That is what you are. Look at it, be aware; don’t shape it, don’t guide it, don’t deny it, don’t have opinions about it. By looking at it without condemnation, without judgement, without comparison, you observe; out of that observation, out of that awareness comes affection. Now, go still further. And you can do this in one flash. It can only be done in one flash — not first from the outside and then working further and deeper and deeper and deeper; it does not work that way, it is all done with one sweep, from the outermost to the most inward, to the innermost depth. Out of this, in this, there is attention — attention to the whistle of that train, the noise, the coughing, the way you are jerking your legs about; attention whereby you listen to what is said, you find out what is true and what is false in what is being said, and you do not set up the speaker as an authority. So this attention comes out of this extraordinarily complex existence of contradiction, misery and utter despair. And when the mind is attentive, it can then give focus, which then is quite a different thing; then it can concentrate but that concentration is not the concentration of exclusion. Then the mind can give attention to whatever it is doing, and that attention becomes much more efficient, much more vital, because you are taking everything in.”

Vol. XIV, p. 301
Posthumous publications, The Collected Works

“Now, one sees all that by observing, by being aware, watching, one is aware of all this. Then out of that awareness you see there is no division between the observer and the observed.”

Saanen, Switzerland (5 August 1973)
1970s
Contexto: Now, one sees all that by observing, by being aware, watching, one is aware of all this. Then out of that awareness you see there is no division between the observer and the observed. It is a trick of thought which demands security. Please don't madam, please. And by being aware it sees the observer is the observed, that violence is the observer, violence is not different from the observer. Now how is the observer to end himself and not be violent? Have you understood my question so far? I think so. Right? The observer is the observed, there is no division and therefore no conflict. And is the observer then, knowing all the intricacies of naming, linguistically caught in the image of violence, what happens to that violence? If the observer is violent, can the observer end, otherwise violence will go on? Can the observer end himself, because he is violent? Or what reality has the observer? Right sir? Is he merely put together by words, by experience, by knowledge? So is he put together by the past? So is he the past? Right? Which means the mind is living in the past. Right? obviously. You are living in the past. Right? No? As long as there is an observer there must be living in the past, obviously. And all our life is based on the past, memories, knowledge, images, according to which you react, which is your conditioning, is the past. And living has become the living of the past in the present, modified in the future. That's all, as long as the observer is living. Now does the mind see this as a truth, as a reality, that all my life is living in the past? I may paint most abstract pictures, write the most modern poems, invent the most extraordinary machinery, but I am still living in the past.

“Can the mind resolve a psychological problem immediately?”

1st Public Talk, Ojai, California (1 April 1980)
1980s

“Is it possible to observe without the observer?”

1st Public Talk, Bombay (Mumbai), India (7 February 1971)
1970s

“Despair exists only when there is hope.”

11th Public Talk, London, UK (25 May 1961)
1960s

“Thought nourishes, sustains and gives continuity to fear and pleasure.”

3rd Public Talk, Bombay (Mumbai), India (14 February 1971)
1970s

“You can look only when the mind is completely quiet.”

2nd Public Talk, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (12 May 1968)
1960s

“There's a great and unutterable beauty in all this.”

Fuente: 1970s, Krishnamurti's Notebook (1976), p. 166

“The moment I am aware that I am aware, I am not aware. Awareness means the observer is not.”

7th Public Discussion, Saanen, Switzerland (10 August 1971)
1970s

“To learn about oneself, a living thing, you have to watch, learn anew each minute.”

4th Public Talk, Bombay (Mumbai), India (17 February 1971)
1970s

“What is correct action in a deteriorating world?”

2nd Seminar Meeting, Brockwood Park, UK (14 September 1979)
1970s

Autores similares

Jawaharlal Nehru Foto
Jawaharlal Nehru 4
político hindú
Aldous Huxley Foto
Aldous Huxley 215
escritor británico
Emil Cioran Foto
Emil Cioran 80
filósofo y ensayista rumano
Umberto Eco Foto
Umberto Eco 132
escritor y filósofo italiano
Edith Stein Foto
Edith Stein 5
filósofa, mística, religiosa carmelita, mártir y santa alem…
José Ortega Y Gasset Foto
José Ortega Y Gasset 179
filósofo y ensayista español
Yasunari Kawabata Foto
Yasunari Kawabata 34
Escritor Japones, Ganador del Premio Nobel
Henri Bergson Foto
Henri Bergson 14
escritor y filósofo irracionalista francés
Simone Weil Foto
Simone Weil 31
Filósofa francesa, activista social, mística cristiana