„[E]xceptional claims demand exceptional evidence.“
— Christopher Hitchens
god is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything
Frases de Christopher Hitchens
4 0
Christopher Hitchens
Fecha de nacimiento: 13. Abril 1949
Fecha de muerte: 15. Diciembre 2011
Otros nombres:Christopher Eric Hitchens
Anuncio
Christopher Eric Hitchens [1][2] fue un escritor, periodista, ensayista, orador, crítico literario y polemista angloestadounidense, que residió en Estados Unidos. Contribuyó en publicaciones como New Statesman, The Nation, The Atlantic, London Review of Books, The Times Literary Supplement, Slate, y Vanity Fair. Era conocido por muchos por su estilo de argumento ingenioso y directo. Hitchens fue el autor, co-autor, editor o co-editor de más de 30 libros, entre ellos cinco colecciones de ensayos, en una gama de temas, incluyendo la política, la literatura y la religión. También fue conocido por sus críticas hacia la historia oculta de varias figuras públicas o populares como la Madre Teresa, Bill Clinton, Henry Kissinger, y la princesa Diana.
Fue un notable critico de la religión y antiteista. Según Hitchens, el concepto de un dios o un ser supremo es una creencia totalitaria que destruye la libertad individual; la libre expresión y el descubrimiento científico deben sustituir a la religión como un medio de enseñanza de la ética y la definición de la civilización humana. Hitchens fue autor de Dios no es bueno , incluido en la lista de libros mejor vendidos del New York Times.
Autores similares
Pier Paolo Pasolini6
escritor, poeta y director de cine italianoRosario Castellanos4
escritora y diplomática mexicanaItalo Calvino41
Escritor y periodista italianoRubem Fonseca8
escritor brasileñoAdolfo Bioy Casares44
escritor argentinoYasunari Kawabata37
Escritor Japones, Ganador del Premio NobelPío Baroja21
escritor españolFrases Christopher Hitchens
Anuncio
„No se trata de que sean ironías de la historia, sino de que la propia historia es irónica. No es que no existan certezas, sino que existe la absoluta certeza de que no hay certezas. No solo es cierto que el único examen de conocimiento es la conciencia aguda y cultivada de lo poco que sabe uno (como bien sabía Sócrates), sino que es cierto que ilimitadas zonas y campos de lo que uno ignora se extienden de tal modo y a tal velocidad que contemplarlos resulta casi fantásticamente hermoso. Entonces, una razón por la que no volvería a vivir mi vida es que uno no puede nacer sabiendo esas cosas.“
— Christopher Hitchens
Hitch-22: A Memoir
„That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.“
— Christopher Hitchens, god is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything
Context: Forgotten were the elementary rules of logic, that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and that what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.
Variant: "What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." in
"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." appears by itself in God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything (2007).
Translation of the Latin phrase "Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.".
„Human decency is not derived from religion. It precedes it.“
— Christopher Hitchens, god is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything
Anuncio
„The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.“
— Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
„I'll give you all the miracles and you'll still be left exactly where you are now, holding an empty sack.“
— Christopher Hitchens
Context: I'll grant you that it would possible to track the pregnancy of the woman Mary who's mentioned about three times in the Bible and to show there was no male intervention in her life at all but yet she delivered herself of a healthy baby boy. I can say— I don't say that's impossible. Parthenogenesis is not completely unthinkable. It does not prove that his paternity is divine and it wouldn't prove that any of his moral teachings were thereby correct. Nor, if I was to see him executed one day and see him walking the streets the next, would that show that his father was God or his mother was a virgin or that his teachings were true, especially given the commonplace nature of resurrection at that time and place. After all, Lazarus was raised, never said a word about it. The was raised, didn't say a thing about what she'd been through. And the Gospels tell us that at the time of the crucifixion all the graves in Jerusalem opened and their occupants wandered around the streets to greet people. So it seems resurrection was something of a banality at the time. Not all of those people clearly were divinely conceived. So I'll give you all the miracles and you'll still be left exactly where you are now, holding an empty sack.
"Does God Exist?" debate http://hitchensdebates.blogspot.com/2010/11/hitchens-vs-turek-vcu.html vs.
„Emancipate yourself from the idea of a celestial dictatorship and you've taken the first step to becoming free.“
— Christopher Hitchens
Context: Religion is the outcome of unresolved contradictions in the material world. If you make the assumption that it's man-made then very few things are mysterious to you: It would be obvious to you why there are so many religions; You will understand why it is that religion has been such a disappointment to our species - that despite innumerable revivals, innumerable attempts again to preach the truth, innumerable attempts to convert the heathen, innumerable attempts to send missionaries all around the world - that the same problems remain with us. That nothing is resolved by this. If all religions died out, or were admitted to be false, all of our problems would be exactly what they are now: How do we live with one another? Where, indeed, do morals and ethics come from? What are our duties to one another? How shall we build the just city? How shall we practice love? All these questions would remain exactly the same. Emancipate yourself from the idea of a celestial dictatorship and you've taken the first step to becoming free.
Christopher Hitchens vs. William Lane Craig, 04/04/2009 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KBx4vvlbZ8&t=1h45m56s
Anuncio
„What is it like to lie to children and tell them that they have an authority, that they must love and be terrified of it at the same time. What's that like? I want to know.“
— Christopher Hitchens
Context: On our integrity, our basic integrity, knowing right from wrong and being able to choose a right action over a wrong one, I think one must repudiate the claim that one doesn't have this moral discrimination innately, that, no, it must come only from the agency of a celestial dictatorship which one must love and simultaneously fear. What is it like to lie to children and tell them that they have an authority, that they must love and be terrified of it at the same time. What's that like? I want to know. And that we don't have an innate sense of right and wrong, children don't have an innate sense of fairness and decency, which of course they do. What is it like?
Christopher Hitchens vs. Alister McGrath, 11/10/2007 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xq-KiDdYvsY&t=15m17s
„If it is a plan or a design, the planner must be either very capricious - really toying with his creation; and/or very clumsy, very tinkering and fantastically wasteful - throw away 99.9% of what you've made; or very cruel and very callous; or just perhaps very indifferent“
— Christopher Hitchens
Context: If this was the plan - was it made by someone who likes us? And if so, why have 99.9% of all the other species that have ever been created already died out? And part of what plan was that?; If it is a plan or a design, the planner must be either very capricious - really toying with his creation; and/or very clumsy, very tinkering and fantastically wasteful - throw away 99.9% of what you've made; or very cruel and very callous; or just perhaps very indifferent; or some combination of all the above. And so it's no good saying that He moves in mysterious ways, or that He has purposes that are opaque to us, because even that kind of evasion has to make itself predicate on the assumption that the person saying this knows more than I do about the supernatural, and I haven't yet met anyone who does have a private line to the creator, of the sort that would be required even to speculate about it. In other words, I haven't met anyone, in holy orders or out of it, who isn't also a primate. And neither have you. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVvJf9wTQXo
"Does Religion Poison Everything?", Festival of Dangerous Ideas, October 2009.
„You either accept the principle of royal intervention or you don't. And if you don't, you always have the choice of an actual 'Commonwealth' - the beautiful and resonant name given by the English revolutionaries to the most forbidden passage of our history after the removal of the Stuarts.“
— Christopher Hitchens
Context: The evidence is that on 'Commonwealth' questions Her Majesty reserves a certain autonomy when it comes to the expression of an opinion. But you can't have it both ways. Queen Victoria used to browbeat poor Mr Gladstone most dreadfully when it came to overseas or, as they were then called, 'imperial' matters. Either this is proper or it isn't. You either accept the principle of royal intervention or you don't. And if you don't, you always have the choice of an actual 'Commonwealth' - the beautiful and resonant name given by the English revolutionaries to the most forbidden passage of our history after the removal of the Stuarts.
„Is there anything that is forbidden to anybody who says they have God on their side?“
— Christopher Hitchens
Context: Is there anything that is forbidden to anybody who says they have God on their side? Who says they have God with them? Is there any evil that they forbid themselves to do? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSeHsCPayXM?t=37m36s
"Is Christianity the Problem?", debate with Dinesh D'Souza, 22/10/2007.
