Frases de Ron Paul

Ronald Ernest "Ron" Paul es un médico y político estadounidense, miembro del Partido Republicano, exrepresentante por el decimocuarto distrito de Texas en la Cámara de Representantes del Congreso de los Estados Unidos. Reside en Lake Jackson, ciudad del mismo estado. Formó parte del Comité de Asuntos Exteriores, el Comité Económico Mixto, el Comité de Servicios Financieros, y fue presidente del Subcomité de Política Monetaria Interior, donde ha sido un crítico de las actuales políticas exteriores y monetarias estadounidenses, abogando por la auditoría y disolución de la Reserva Federal.

Paul se graduó en el Gettysburg College y en la Universidad Duke, donde consiguió su título en medicina. Sirvió como cirujano de vuelo en la Fuerza Aérea de los Estados Unidos desde 1963 hasta 1968, durante la Guerra de Vietnam. Trabajó como médico obstetra y ginecólogo en los años sesenta y setenta, atendiendo más de 4.000 partos, antes de entrar en la política en 1976.

Es el fundador del grupo de presión Campaign for Liberty y sus ideas han sido expresadas en numerosos artículos y libros publicados, incluyendo Liberty Defined: 50 Essential Issues That Affect Our Freedom , End the Fed , The Revolution: A Manifesto , Pillars of Prosperity , A Foreign Policy of Freedom: Peace, Commerce, and Honest Friendship , y The Case for Gold . De acuerdo con Keith Poole, un politólogo de la Universidad de Georgia, Paul tiene el registro de votos más conservador que ningún otro miembro del Congreso desde 1937.[1]​ Su hijo Rand Paul fue elegido para el Senado de los Estados Unidos por Kentucky en 2011, siendo la primera vez que coinciden en el congreso un padre y un hijo.[2]​

Ha sido llamado el "padrino intelectual" del Tea Party.[3]​[4]​ Ha conseguido notoriedad por sus posiciones libertarias en muchos temas políticos, chocando a menudo con los dirigentes de los partidos republicano y demócrata. Paul ha postulado tres veces para la Presidencia de los Estados Unidos, primero en 1988 como candidato del Partido Libertario y de nuevo en 2008 y 2012 como republicano. En diciembre de 2010, Ron Paul, partidario de eliminar el banco central, fue nombrado presidente del comité que controla la Reserva Federal.[5]​ En mayo de 2011, Paul anunció oficialmente que se postularía a la presidencia una vez más como candidato del partido republicano en el año 2012.[6]​ El 13 de julio de 2011 anunció que no buscará la reelección al congreso en el 2012 para concentrarse en su campaña a la presidencia.[7]​ Wikipedia  

✵ 20. agosto 1935
Ron Paul Foto
Ron Paul: 159   frases 1   Me gusta

Frases célebres de Ron Paul

“La libertad no se define por la seguridad. La libertad se define por la capacidad de los ciudadanos de vivir sin la interferencia del gobierno. El gobierno no puede crear un mundo sin riesgos, ni desearíamos realmente vivir en un lugar tan ficticio. Solo una sociedad totalitaria reclamaría la seguridad absoluta como un ideal digno, porque requeriría un control estatal total sobre la vida de sus ciudadanos.”

Original: «Freedom is not defined by safety. Freedom is defined by the ability of citizens to live without government interference. Government cannot create a world without risks, nor would we really wish to live in such a fictional place. Only a totalitarian society would even claim absolute safety as a worthy ideal, because it would require total state control over its citizens’ lives».
Fuente: Chase the Rabbit. Grieger, F. A. WestBow Press, 2015. ISBN 9781490862897. En google libros. https://books.google.es/books?id=NFpqCAAAQBAJ&pg=PT24&dq=Chase+the+Rabbit&hl=es&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjYy6fXk_rmAhVuAGMBHfKKB-0Q6AEIKzAA#v=onepage&q=Freedom%20is%20not%20defined%20by%20safety.%20Freedom%20is%20defined%20&f=false Consultado el 10 de enero de 2020.

“Una cosa está clara: los Padres Fundadores nunca pretendieron una nación donde los ciudadanos pagaran casi la mitad de todo lo que ganan al gobierno.”

Original: «One thing is clear: The Founding Fathers never intended a nation where citizens would pay nearly half of everything they earn to the government».
Fuente: How Do I Tax Thee?: A Field Guide to the Great American Rip-Off. Tate, Kristin. St. Martin's Publishing Group, 2018. ISBN 9781250169679. Página 197. En google libros. https://books.google.es/books?id=N4VCDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=How+Do+I+Tax+Thee?:+A+Field+Guide+to+the+Great+American+Rip-Off&hl=es&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwje7ZfKjvrmAhWZD2MBHUWtChEQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=One%20thing%20is%20clear%3A%20The%20Founding%20Fathers%20never%20intended%20&f=false Consultado el 10 de enero de 2020.

“Estoy absolutamente convencido de que la mejor fórmula para darnos paz y preservar el estilo de vida estadounidense es la libertad, un gobierno limitado y ocuparnos de nuestros propios negocios en el extranjero.”

«I am just absolutely convinced that the best formula for giving us peace and preserving the American way of life is freedom, limited government, and minding our own business overseas».
Fuente: Foreign Policy of Freedom. Paul, Ron. Ludwig von Mises Institute. ISBN 9781610164474. Página 176. En google libros. https://books.google.es/books?id=-138BbPZOggC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Foreign+Policy+of+Freedom&hl=es&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj8v8qZg_rmAhXdQEEAHY0kBEcQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=I%20am%20just%20absolutely%20convinced%20&f=false Consultado el 10 de enero de 2020.

“El elemento más importante de una sociedad libre, donde los derechos individuales se tienen en la más alta estima, es el rechazo al inicio de la violencia.”

Original: «The most important element of a free society, where individual rights are held in the highest esteem, is the rejection of the initiation of violence».
Fuente: Freedom Under Siege. Paul, Ron. Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2007. ISBN 9781610164443. En google libros. https://books.google.es/books?id=tw4v7kEZetkC&pg=PA38&dq=The+most+important+element+of+a+free+society,+where+individual+rights+are+held+in+the+highest+esteem,+is+the+rejection+of+the+initiation+of+violence&hl=es&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjXjIXB_vnmAhUS8uAKHbwYBN4Q6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=The%20most%20important%20element%20of%20a%20free%20society%2C%20where%20individual%20rights%20are%20held%20in%20the%20highest%20esteem%2C%20is%20the%20rejection%20of%20the%20initiation%20of%20violence&f=false Consultado el 10 de enero de 2020.

“Dar un buen ejemplo es una forma mucho mejor de difundir ideales que a través de la fuerza de las armas.”

Original: «Setting a good example is a far better way to spread ideals than through force of arms».
Fuente: We the Who?: A Citizen’S Manifesto on America. Lewis, Brett H. iUniverse, 2013. ISBN 9781491708675. Página 146. En google libros. https://books.google.es/books?id=BzWGAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA146&dq=Setting+a+good+example+is+a+far+better+way+to+spread+ideals+than+through+force+of+arms&hl=es&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi66te28vnmAhUlAmMBHYg5C_kQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=Setting%20a%20good%20example%20is%20a%20far%20better%20way%20to%20spread%20ideals%20than%20through%20force%20of%20arms&f=false Consultado el 10 de enero de 2020.

“Si el gobierno no puede mantener las drogas fuera de sus propias prisiones, ¿Cómo podrían hacerlo en cualquier otro lado?”

“If the government can´t keep drugs out of their own prisons, how can they do it at any place else?”

Ron Paul Frases y Citas

“La Paz es un mensaje poderoso… la lógica nos dice que podemos hacer un mundo mucho mejor de una forma mucho más fácil que causando guerras.”

“Peace is a powerful message… logic tells us that we can make a better world in a much easier way than causing wars.”

“No vienen a atacarnos porque somos ricos y libres, vienen y nos atacan porque estamos allá. ¿Qué pensaríamos si otros paises hicieran eso con nosotros?”

“They don´t come here to attack us because we are rich and we are free, they come and they attack us beacause we are over there ¿What would we think if other foreign countries were doing that to us?”

“Soy Ron Paul. Soy un congresista de Texas sirviendo en mi décimo mandato. Soy el campeón de la Constitución.”

“I´m Ron Paul. I´m a Congressman from Texas, serving my 10th term. I am the champion of the Constitution.”

“Si uno realmente quiere resolver los problemas de la pobreza, del desempleo y de las preocupaciones económicas, uno debe creer en el Libre Mercado. El Libre Mercado es humanitario, es la fuerza del gobierno la que es inhumana.”

“If you really want to solve the problems of poverty, unemployment and economic concerns, yo have to believe in the Free Market. Free Market is humanitarian, it´s the government´s force that is inhumane.”

“Los Fundadores de nuestro país apreciaban la libertad, no la democracia.”

“Our country’s founders cherished liberty, not democracy.”

Ron Paul: Frases en inglés

“There is but one special interest that we should be working for, and that would solve just about all of our problems, and that is our liberty.”

Speech on the Patriot Act, 2003 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6O7D7nDF0U8
2000s, 2001-2005

“A grand absurdity, a great deception, a delusion of momentous proportions based on preposterous notions and on ideas whose time should never have come. Simplicity, grossly distorted and complicated. Insanity, passed off as logic. Grandiose schemes built on falsehoods with the morality of Ponzi and Madoff. Evil described as virtue. Ignorance pawned off as wisdom. Destruction and impoverishment in the name of humanitarianism. Violence, the tool of change. Preventive wars used as a road to peace. Tolerance delivered by government guns. Reactionary views in the guise of progress. An empire replacing the republic. Slavery sold as liberty. Excellence and virtue traded for mediocrity. Socialism to save capitalism. A government out of control, unrestrained by the constitution, the rule of law or morality. Bickering over petty politics as we descend into chaos.”

Is this reality or just a bad dream? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdXh6ASMfpc (19 May 2009)
2000s, 2006-2009
Contexto: The title to my special order tonight is 'Current Conditions or Just a Bad Dream'.
Could it all be a bad dream or a nightmare? Is it my imagination or have we lost our minds? It's surreal, it's just not believable. A grand absurdity, a great deception, a delusion of momentous proportions based on preposterous notions and on ideas whose time should never have come. Simplicity, grossly distorted and complicated. Insanity, passed off as logic. Grandiose schemes built on falsehoods with the morality of Ponzi and Madoff. Evil described as virtue. Ignorance pawned off as wisdom. Destruction and impoverishment in the name of humanitarianism. Violence, the tool of change. Preventive wars used as a road to peace. Tolerance delivered by government guns. Reactionary views in the guise of progress. An empire replacing the republic. Slavery sold as liberty. Excellence and virtue traded for mediocrity. Socialism to save capitalism. A government out of control, unrestrained by the constitution, the rule of law or morality. Bickering over petty politics as we descend into chaos. The philosophy that destroys us is not even defined.
We have broken from reality a psychotic nation. Ignorance with a pretense of knowledge replacing wisdom. Money does not grow on trees, nor does prosperity come from a government printing press or escalating deficits. We are now in the midst of unlimited spending of the people's money. Exorbitant taxation, deficits of trillions of dollars spent on a failed welfare-warfare system. An epidemic of cronyism. Unlimited supplies of paper money equated with wealth. A central bank that deliberately destroys the value of the currency in secrecy, without restraint, without nary a whimper, yet cheered on by the pseudo-capitalists of Wall Street, the military-industrial complex, and Detroit.
We police our world empire with troops on 700 bases and in 130 countries around the world. A dangerous war now spreads throughout the Middle East and Central Asia. Thousands of innocent people being killed as we become known as the torturers of the 21st century. We assume that by keeping the already known torture pictures from the public's eye, we will be remembered only as a generous and good people. If our enemies want to attack us only because we are free and rich, proof of torture would be irrelevant. The sad part of all this is that we have forgotten what made America great, good and prosperous. We need to quickly refresh our memories and once again reinvigorate our love, understanding, and confidence in liberty. The status quo cannot be maintained considering the current conditions. Violence and lost liberty will result without some revolutionary thinking. We must escape from the madness of crowds now gathering.
The good news is that reversal is achievable through peaceful and intellectual means, and fortunately the number of those who care are growing exponentially. Of course it could all be a bad dream, a nightmare, and that I'm seriously mistaken, overreacting, and that my worries are unfounded. I hope so. But just in case, we ought to prepare ourselves for revolutionary changes in the not-too-distant future.
I yield back the balance of my time.

“We can think back no further than July of 1996, when a plane carrying several hundred people suddenly and mysteriously crashed off the coast of Long Island. Within days, Congress had passed emergency legislation calling for costly new security measures, including a controversial “screening” method which calls for airlines to arbitrarily detain passengers just because the person meets certain criteria which border on racist and xenophobic.”

Emotion should never dictate policy https://web.archive.org/web/20120119215614/http://www.ronpaularchive.com/1998/01/emotion-should-never-dictate-policy/ (January 12, 1998).
Press conference regarding the impeachment of President Clinton, 1998.
1990s
Contexto: In the emotion of the moment, people often say and do reckless things. For the individual, that can have deep ramifications. But when it is a single individual acting unreasonably in the throes of emotion in the face of sorrow, then the consequences are borne by only that person and his family. But when the government behaves recklessly in response to a tragedy, the consequences can be felt by everyone. This is especially true when politicians get in on the act. We can think back no further than July of 1996, when a plane carrying several hundred people suddenly and mysteriously crashed off the coast of Long Island. Within days, Congress had passed emergency legislation calling for costly new security measures, including a controversial “screening” method which calls for airlines to arbitrarily detain passengers just because the person meets certain criteria which border on racist and xenophobic.

“The real isolationists are those who choose to use force overseas to promote democracy, rather than seek change through diplomacy, engagement, and by setting a positive example”

"I advocate the same foreign policy the Founding Fathers would", open letter to the Union Leader http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?articleId=cc287b0f-941c-4b07-88e9-9e992810f700,Union Leader (2007)
2000s, 2006-2009
Contexto: It is not we non-interventionists who are isolationists. The real isolationists are those who impose sanctions and embargoes on countries and peoples across the globe because they disagree with the internal and foreign policies of their leaders. The real isolationists are those who choose to use force overseas to promote democracy, rather than seek change through diplomacy, engagement, and by setting a positive example.

“War is not popular. People get killed, and body bags end up coming back.”

Ron Paul libro A Foreign Policy of Freedom: Peace, Commerce, and Honest Friendship

A Foreign Policy of Freedom: Peace, Commerce, and Honest Friendship, p. 206.
Contexto: War is not popular. It may seem popular in the short run, when there appears to be an immediate victory and everyone is gloating but war is not popular. War is not popular. People get killed, and body bags end up coming back. War is very unpopular, and it is not the politically smart thing to do.

“In a free-market economy, the consumer is king: labor unions don't run things, business people don't run things, bankers don't run things, politicians don't run things, but the success of a business depends on how people spend their money.”

In response to the question "What is your opinion on direct democracy, where the citizens themselves make law, rather than elected representatives?" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-nfaTZNWcI (May 14, 2015)
2010s

“We have depended on government for so much for so long that we as people have become less vigilant of our liberties.”

1990s
Contexto: We have depended on government for so much for so long that we as people have become less vigilant of our liberties. As long as the government provides largesse for the majority, the special interest lobbyists will succeed in continuing the redistribution of welfare programs that occupies most of Congress's legislative time.

Speech in the House of Representatives, September 17, 1997

“The racist effects of Davis-Bacon are no mere coincidence. In fact, many original supporters of Davis-Bacon, such as Representative Clayton Allgood, bragged about supporting Davis-Bacon as a means of keeping cheap colored labor out of the construction industry.”

Repeal Of The Davis-Bacon Law https://web.archive.org/web/20120119214747/http://www.ronpaularchive.com/1997/10/repeal-of-the-davis-bacon-law/ (23 October 1997).
1990s
Contexto: Because most minority-owned construction firms are small companies, Davis-Bacon keeps minority-owned firms from competing for Federal construction contracts. The resulting disparities in employment create a demand for affirmative action, another ill-suited and ill-advised Big Government program. The racist effects of Davis-Bacon are no mere coincidence. In fact, many original supporters of Davis-Bacon, such as Representative Clayton Allgood, bragged about supporting Davis-Bacon as a means of keeping cheap colored labor out of the construction industry.

“I didn't write them, I didn't read them at the time, and I disavow them.”

Ron Paul Walks Out On CNN Interview http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/ron-paul-and-the-racist-newsletters-fact-checker-biography/2011/12/21/gIQAKNiwBP_blog.html (December 21, 2011)
2010s
Contexto: Paul: I didn't write them, I disavow them...
Q: So you read them, but didn't do anything.
Paul: I never read that stuff. I was probably aware of it ten years after it was written... it's going on twenty years that people have pestered me about this.
Q: Well, wouldn't you say it's a legitimate question?
Paul: When you get the answer, it's legitimate that you sorta take the answer I give. You know what the answer is? "I didn't write them, I didn't read them at the time, and I disavow them."

“One of the worst aspects of the census is its focus on classifying people by race. When government tells us it wants information to help any given group, it assumes every individual who shares certain physical characteristics has the same interests, or wants the same things from government. This is an inherently racist and offensive assumption. The census, like so many federal policies and programs, inflames racism by encouraging Americans to see themselves as members of racial groups fighting each other for a share of the federal pie.”

None of Your Business! https://web.archive.org/web/20120127122559/http://www.ronpaularchive.com/2004/07/none-of-your-business (12 July 2004).
2000s, 2001-2005
Contexto: I introduced an amendment last week that would have eliminated funds for this intrusive survey in a spending bill, explaining on the House floor that perhaps the American people dont appreciate being threatened by Big Brother. The amendment was met by either indifference or hostility, as most members of Congress either dont care about or actively support government snooping into the private affairs of citizens. One of the worst aspects of the census is its focus on classifying people by race. When government tells us it wants information to help any given group, it assumes every individual who shares certain physical characteristics has the same interests, or wants the same things from government. This is an inherently racist and offensive assumption. The census, like so many federal policies and programs, inflames racism by encouraging Americans to see themselves as members of racial groups fighting each other for a share of the federal pie.

“It is not we non-interventionists who are isolationists.”

The real isolationists are those who impose sanctions and embargoes on countries and peoples across the globe because they disagree with the internal and foreign policies of their leaders. The real isolationists are those who choose to use force overseas to promote democracy, rather than seek change through diplomacy, engagement, and by setting a positive example.
"I advocate the same foreign policy the Founding Fathers would", open letter to the Union Leader http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?articleId=cc287b0f-941c-4b07-88e9-9e992810f700, Union Leader (2007)
2000s, 2006-2009

“But let it not be said that we did nothing.”

In the Name of Patriotism (Who are the Patriots?), May 22, 2007 http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2007/cr0522107.htm http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul388.html
2000s, 2006-2009
Contexto: The original American patriots were those individuals brave enough to resist with force the oppressive power of King George. I accept the definition of patriotism as that effort to resist oppressive state power. The true patriot is motivated by a sense of responsibility, and out of self interest -- for himself, his family, and the future of his country -- to resist government abuse of power. He rejects the notion that patriotism means obedience to the state. [... ] Resistance to illegal and unconstitutional usurpation of our rights is required. Each of us must choose which course of action we should take: education, conventional political action, or even peaceful civil disobedience to bring about necessary changes. But let it not be said that we did nothing. Let not those who love the power of the welfare/warfare state label the dissenters of authoritarianism as unpatriotic or uncaring. Patriotism is more closely linked to dissent than it is to conformity and a blind desire for safety and security. Understanding the magnificent rewards of a free society makes us unbashful in its promotion, fully realizing that maximum wealth is created and the greatest chance for peace comes from a society respectful of individual liberty.

“In the free society envisioned by the founders, schools are held accountable to parents, not federal bureaucrats.”

Statement on the Congressional Education Plan, May 23, 2001 http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2001/cr052301.htm
2000s, 2001-2005

“We endorse the idea of voluntarism, self-responsibility, family, friends, and churches to solve problems, rather than saying that some monolithic government is going to make you take care of yourself and be a better person”

The Morton Downey Jr. Show, July 4, 1988 youtube.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCxDrfs4GtM&t=854
1980s
Contexto: Question: Your solutions, on stopping drug trade, is, give up, give up to world drugs. I say zero tolerance, we use the military for aid, we stop it from getting into the country, we cut it off at the source. Why give up on that fight?
Ron Paul: What we give up on is a tyrannical approach to solving a social and medical problem, and We endorse the idea of voluntarism, self-responsibility, family, friends, and churches to solve problems, rather than saying that some monolithic government is going to make you take care of yourself and be a better person. It's a preposterous notion, it never worked, it never will. The government can't make you a better person, it can't make you follow good habits. Why don't they put you on a diet; you're a little overweight, and i think you need government help!

“Neil Cavuto: Yeah but, you can't, Congressman, we've got a pretty good economy going here, right? We've got productivity soaring. We've got retail sales that are strong. We've got corporate earnings that for, what, the 19th quarter, are up double digit? We've got a market chasing highs, I mean, this isn't happening in a vacuum, right?
Ron Paul: Yeah, that's nice, but when you have to borrow, you know… My personal finances would be very good if I borrowed a million dollars every month. But, someday, the bills will become due. And the bills will come due in this country, and then we'll have to pay for it. We can't afford this war, and we can't afford the entitlement system.
Neil Cavuto: Look, Congressman, did you say this 10 years ago, when the numbers were similarly strong…
Ron Paul: Go back and check.
Neil Cavuto: …and we were still borrowing a good deal then.
Ron Paul: That's right, that means the dollar bubble is much bigger than ever.
Neil Cavuto: So what's gonna happen?
Ron Paul: We've had the NASDAQ bubble collapse already. We have the housing bubble in the middle of a collapse, so the dollar bubble will collapse as well. We have to live within our means. You can't print money out of the blue, and think you can print your money into prosperity.”

Your World with Neil Cavuto, FOX News, May 15, 2007 http://www.newshounds.us/2007/05/16/rep_ron_paul_tells_fox_newsrepublicans_the_truth_they_dont_like_hearing_it.php http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MU2RK0TNbXk
2000s, 2006-2009

“Question: You wanna gut that safety net…
Ron Paul: But the safety net doesn't work.
Question: Tell me why it doesn't work.
Ron Paul: It does work for some people, but overall it ultimately fails, because you spend more money than you have, and then you borrow to the hilt. Now we have to borrow $800 billion a year just to keep the safety net going. It's going to collapse when the dollar collapses, you can't even fight the war without this borrowing. And when the dollar collapses, you can't take care of the elderly of today. They're losing ground. Their cost of living is going up about 10%, even though the government denies it, we give them a 2% cost of living increase.
Question: So do you think the gold standard would fix that?
Ron Paul: The gold standard would keep you from printing money and destroying the middle class. Every country where you have runaway inflation, there's no middle class. Mexico, there's no middle class, you have a huge poor class, and a lot of wealthy people. Today we have a growing poor class, and we have more billionaires than ever before. So we're moving into third world status…
Question: Who is the safety net that you're speaking of, who does benefit from all those programs and all those agencies?
Ron Paul: Everybody on a short term benefits for a time. If you build a tenement house by the government, for about 15 or 20 years somebody might live there, but you don't measure who paid for it: somebody lost their job down the road, somebody had inflation, somebody else suffered. But then the tenement house falls down after about 20 years because it's not privately owned, so everybody eventually suffers. But the immediate victims aren't identifiable, because you don't know who lost the job, and who had the inflation, the victims are invisible. The few people who benefit, who get some help from government, everyone sees, "oh! look what we did!", but they never say instead of what, what did we lose. And unless you ask that question, we'll go into bankruptcy, we're in the early stages of it, the dollar is going down, our standard of living is going down, and we're hurting the very people that so many people wanna help, especially the liberals…”

Interview by Mac McKoy on KWQW, December 17, 2007 http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=x3lxo9WIR6w
2000s, 2006-2009

“Ron Paul: What's happening is, there's transfer of wealth from the poor and the middle class to the wealthy. This comes about because of the monetary system that we have. When you inflate a currency or destroy a currency, the middle class gets wiped out. So the people who get to use the money first which is created by the Federal Reserve system benefit. So the money gravitates to the banks and to Wall Street. That's why you have more billionaires than ever before. Today, this country is in the middle of a recession for a lot of people… As long as we live beyond our means we are destined to live beneath our means. And we have lived beyond our means because we are financing a foreign policy that is so extravagant and beyond what we can control, as well as the spending here at home. And we're depending on the creation of money out of thin air, which is nothing more than debasement of the currency. It's counterfeit… So, if you want a healthy economy, you have to study monetary theory and figure out why it is that we're suffering. And everybody doesn't suffer equally, or this wouldn't be so bad. It's always the poor people -- those who are on retired incomes -- that suffer the most. But the politicians and those who get to use the money first, like the military industrial complex, they make a lot of money and they benefit from it.
John McCain: Everybody is paying taxes and wealth creates wealth. And the fact is that I would commend to your reading, Ron, "Wealth of Nations," because that's what this is all about. A vibrant economy creates wealth. People pay taxes. Revenues are at an all time high.”

GOP debate, Dearborn, Michigan, October 9, 2007 http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071009/NEWS02/71009073
2000s, 2006-2009

“Tax revenues are up 59 percent since 1980. Because of our economic growth? No. During Carter's four years, we had growth of 37.2 percent; Reagan's five years have given us 30.7 percent. The new revenues are due to four giant Republican tax increases since 1981. All republicans rightly chastised Carter for his $38 billion deficit. But they ignore or even defend deficits of $220 billion, as government spending has grown 10.4 percent per year since Reagan took office, while the federal payroll has zoomed by a quarter of a million bureaucrats… big government has been legitimized in a way the Democrats never could have accomplished. It was tragic to listen to Ronald Reagan on the 1986 campaign trail bragging about his high spending on farm subsidies, welfare, warfare, etc… the IRS has grown bigger, richer, more powerful, and more arrogant. In the words of the founders of our country, our government has "sent hither swarms" of tax gatherers "to harass our people and eat out their substance." His officers jailed the innocent George Hansen, with the President refusing to pardon a great American whose only crime was to defend the Constitution. Reagan's new tax "reform" gives even more power to the IRS. Far from making taxes fairer or simpler, it deceitfully raises more revenue for the government to waste… I want to totally disassociate myself from the policies that have given us unprecedented deficits, massive monetary inflation, indiscriminate military spending, an irrational and unconstitutional foreign policy, zooming foreign aid, the exaltation of international banking, and the attack on our personal liberties and privacy.”

Letter to chairman of the RNC http://www.textfiles.com/politics/ron_paul.txt Frank Fahrenkopf (March 1987).
1980s

“Q: "Congressman Paul, you've questioned the fiscal conservatism of all these candidates, but particularly Senator Santorum. You have a new television ad calling him a fake. Why?"”

A: "Because he's a fake. I find it sort of fascinating how when people are running for office they're really fiscally conservative. When they're in office, they vote for something different, and then when they explain themselves they say "Oh! I want to repeal that." So the Senator voted for No Child Left Behind. He voted for it, but now he's running on the effort to get rid of it!.....This loses credibility." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZPexbzJUU4
2012

“Neil Cavuto: …your campaign has received a $500 campaign donation from a white supremacist in West Palm Beach. And your campaign had indicated you have no intention to return it. What are you going to do with that?
Ron Paul: It is probably already spent. Why give it back to him and use it for bad purposes?
Neil Cavuto: …this Don Black who made the donation, and who ran a site called "Stormfront, White Pride Worldwide," now that you know it, now that you're familiar after the fact, you still would not return it?
Ron Paul: Well, if I spent his money and I took the money that maybe you might have sent to me and donate it back to him, that does not make any sense to me. Why should I give him money to promote his cause?
Neil Cavuto: …Hillary Clinton has had to do this, a number of other candidates have had to do this. Do you think that just is a bad practice?
Ron Paul: I think it is pandering. I think it is playing the political correctness… What about the people who get donations, want to get special interests from the military industrial complex? They put in — they raise, bundle their money, and send millions of dollars in there. And they want to rob the taxpayers. That is the real evil … that buys influence in government. And this is, to me, the corruption that should be corrected… you are missing the whole boat — the whole boat, because it is the immorality of government, it's the special interests in government, it's fighting illegal wars…
Neil Cavuto: All right.
Ron Paul: …and financing, and taxing the people, destroying the people through inflation, and undermining this prosperity of the country.”

Your World with Neil Cavuto, FOX News, December 19, 2007 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,317536,00.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrRtZaG63o8
2000s, 2006-2009

“The American people have been offered two lousy choices. One, which is corporatism, a fascist type of approach, or, socialism. We deliver a lot of services in this country through the free market, and when you do it through the free market prices go down. But in medicine, prices go up. Technology doesn't help the cost, it goes up instead of down. But if you look at almost all of our industries that are much freer, technology lowers the prices. Just think of how the price of cell phones goes down. Poor people have cell phones, and televisions, and computers. Prices all go down. But in medicine, they go up, and there's a reason for that, that's because the government is involved with it… I do [think that prices will go down without government involvement], but probably a lot more than what you're thinking about, because you have to have competition in the delivery of care. For instance, if you have a sore throat and you have to come see me, you have to wait in the waiting room, and then get checked, and then get a prescription, and it ends up costing you $100. If you had true competition, you should be able to go to a nurse, who could for 1/10 the cost very rapidly do it, and let her give you a prescription for penicillin. See, the doctors and the medical profession have monopolized the system through licensing. And that's not an accident, because they like the idea that you have to go see the physician and pay this huge price. And patients can sort this out, they're not going to go to a nurse if they need brain surgery…”

Interview by Laura Knoy on NHPR, June 5, 2007 http://info.nhpr.org/node/13016
2000s, 2006-2009

Autores similares

Salvador Allende Foto
Salvador Allende 50
médico y político de Chile, presidente de la República entr…
Albert Schweitzer Foto
Albert Schweitzer 12
médico, filósofo, teólogo y músico
Patch Adams Foto
Patch Adams 11
Doctor and clown
Franklin Delano Roosevelt Foto
Franklin Delano Roosevelt 44
político estadounidense
Hannah Arendt Foto
Hannah Arendt 12
filósofa política alemana y posteriormente estadounidense
Ernesto Guevara Foto
Ernesto Guevara 75
político e ideólogo argentino-cubano
Ronald Reagan Foto
Ronald Reagan 23
actor y político estadounidense
Arthur Conan Doyle Foto
Arthur Conan Doyle 79
escritor escocés
Sigmund Freud Foto
Sigmund Freud 75
médico neurólogo austriaco, considerado el padre del psicoa…
John Fitzgerald Kennedy Foto
John Fitzgerald Kennedy 74
político estadounidense